|
Committing someone to treatment against their will
Sfj |
Committing someone to treatment against
their will.
Occasionally, people on this forum or in the chat room will ask
about committing someone to treatment against their will. This
is often a family member who needs help.
According to Nancy Summers, “Fundamentals of Case Management
Practice”
The criteria for committing
someone against her will are as follows:
1. The person poses a danger to herself or to others, and possibly one or more of the following:
2. The person has a severe mental illness or a mental illness
that is currently acute.
3. The person is unable to function in occupational, social, or
personal areas.
The impairment is severe enough that the person cannot care
adequately for herself.
4. The person has refused to sign a voluntary commitment,
committing herself for treatment, so that an involuntary
commitment is the last resort; or the person is incapable of
signing such a commitment or of choosing treatment for herself.
5. The person can be treated once she is committed; that is,
there are known treatments and medications that can relieve the
acute condition the person is experiencing at present.
6. The commitment adheres to the criteria of the least
restrictive treatment.
Additionally, each state has specific laws that should be
examined and understood, but the six items above are pretty good
guidelines in general. |
Replies... |
macy
stiller |
Re: Committing someone to treatment against
their will.
Quote:
The person has a severe mental
illness or a mental illness that is currently acute
This was very informational to me. And I thank you for that. But
can you tell me what this one means? I am not understanding
(sorry).
Should the person display all of these? One of these or most of
these? Thanks for clarifying. |
Sfj |
Re: Committing someone to treatment against
their will.
To the
best of my knowledge, which is very limited, “Mental Illness” is
defined in the DSM IV. That is a book about two inches thick,
full of definitions and things of that sort.
“Clinical and federal
definitions
The clinical literature uses two main classification systems to
define mental illness. The first system, described in the
American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), is the one most widely
accepted by the clinical community. DSM is a multiaxial
classification system that defines a mental disorder as "a
clinically significant behavioral or psychological syndrome or
pattern that occurs in an individual,...is associated with
present distress...or disability...or with a significant
increased risk of suffering."
The second classification system conceptualizes mental illnesses
as "brain disorders" and is based on the hypothesis that
disruptions in brain function lead to mental illness. Rather
than relying on descriptive criteria such as those in DSM,
biopsychiatrists classify mental disorders on the basis of
heritability, biochemical markers, and anatomical lesions. The
appropriateness of biological psychiatry's classification system
continues to be actively debated. Most clinicians agree that the
use of purely biological criteria is too limiting, because no
single gene or underlying brain lesion has been found for any
disorder except Alzheimer's disease”
ps.psychiatryonline.org/c.../53/9/1089
There are at least a dozen specific disorders associated with
amphetamines.
Here is what I found to be relevant concerning our needs at this
KCI website.
These include, but are not limited to:
Amphetamine Intoxication
Amphetamine Withdrawal
Amphetamine Intoxication Delirium
Amphetamine-Induced Psychotic Disorder, With Delusions
Amphetamine-Induced Psychotic Disorder, with Hallucinations
Amphetamine-Induced Mood Disorder
Amphetamine-Induced Anxiety Disorder
Amphetamine-Induced Sexual Dysfunction
Amphetamine-Induced Sleep Disorder
Amphetamine-Induced Disorder Not Otherwise Specified
There’s more,
Amphetamine Dependence
Amphetamine Abuse
and even
Amphetamine (or Amphetamine-like) – Related disorders.
Sfj note: I got this info from pages 223 through page 231 of the
DSM IV.
My interpretation of this is that Speedfreaks and Tweakers are
crazy. |
Sfj
|
Re: Committing someone to treatment against
their will.
One
doesn't have to display all six items listed in the original
post of this thread. |
forget
suzette |
Re: Committing someone to treatment against
their will.
I got
a cute mental illness!
....I need to get away from my parents too!
hmmm. |
macy
stiller |
Re: Committing someone to treatment against
their will.
Sfj
this really helps me. Thank you so much.
Suzette you are crazy! LOL I would want to be away from my
parents too.. Love them dearly but they drive me to being crazy.
|
Penelope |
Re: Committing someone to treatment against
their will.
Criteria for involuntary treatment in California (Welfare and
Instutions code 5150)
The person is a danger to themselves due to a mental disorder
(drug or alcohol use doesn't exclusively apply)
The person is a danger to others due to a mental disorder
The person is gravely disabled (Unable to provide food,
clothing, or shelter) due to a mental disorder |
See also:
Should meth treatment be forced?
Intervention and Understanding Addiction
Back to Crystal Meth & Methamphetamine Questions, Answers & Advice
|