|
"Tough love" vs. "the fear of drugs"
Sfj |
“Tough Love” vs “The Fear
of Drugs”
During a research assignment, one of my colleagues
shared some of this info with me. Quite often, Parents will ask
what I think about the principles of the “Tough Love” method or
approach to dealing with youngsters who have substance abuse
problems.
I’ve stated my opinions before, so I won’t go into all that on
this post but I’m going to objectively share the findings and
information published on another website.
Sfj
www.nospank.net/szlvtz2.htm
“tough love programs that have been sold to the public as
drug-fighters have a long and undistinguished history. I’d like
to take a few moments to speak about that history, because I
think it’s important to know where this stuff comes from and why
it cannot simply be regulated away or made kinder and gentler.
It’s rotten at the very core.”
“How could this happen? “
“The answer is fear of drugs, spread by dedicated propagandists
with government funding.”
“Where did this idea come from, the idea that kids need to be
broken through public humiliation, emotional and physical
attacks, in order to be cured of drug problems? Where did we get
the idea that hurting kids will help them? Although “tough
cures” have had a long history in criminal justice and
psychiatry, in the addictions field, they start with Synanon, a
California commune founded by an ex-alcoholic and failed
stand-up comic who thought the Alcoholics Anonymous’ philosophy
would work better if it was coerced. When a junkie showed up to
his no-holds-barred encounter groups and got clean, Synanon
began to sell itself as a miracle cure for heroin addiction. At
the time, heroin addicts were believed to be incurable.”
“All of this despite the fact that since Synanon, no one has
ever been able to prove that any of their tough-love tactics
help anyone in any way. With regard to drug use, the programs
which initially supported confront ‘em, break-em-down, scrub the
floor you junkie scum style treatment, like Phoenix House,
eventually recognized that such methods drive people away from
recovery, not into it. Phoenix House now bans humiliation and
confrontation for its own sake—although, like fraternity
initiations, it is hard to get rid of when people who have been
through the “hard way” still staff the place.”
“With regard to alcohol, one famous study found that the more a
counselor confronts, the more the client drinks; the same has
now been found true for drugs. With regard to teenagers,
research on teen boot camps done by the Justice Department found
that they were no more effective than juvenile prison.”
“The most recent death, that of fourteen-year-old Martin Lee
Anderson in a boot camp run by the Florida sheriff’s department,
exemplifies this exactly. Anderson had been made to run laps and
do push-ups and other strenuous exercises, just minutes after he
entered the program. On his last lap, he collapsed, complaining
of shortness of breath.
This was interpreted as defiance, although, as a fellow
participant put it, why would someone complete all but the last
few feet of the last lap if he was non-compliant? But because of
the ideology of these programs, any refusal to do anything is
deliberate and must be punished."
|
Replies... |
danimal
55 |
Re: “Tough Love” vs “The
Fear of Drugs”
"Where did this idea come from?"
Good question!
Unless I'm waaaay off [good chance]...aren't some of the key
root causes of addiction "public humiliation, emotional and
physical attacks"...
along with the resulting guilt, shame, remorse and fear?? |
Guene |
Re: “Tough Love” vs “The
Fear of Drugs”
I
went to a class on tough love, some of it was ok but in the long
run it didn't work on Jamie, she was one smart cookie. I have
known a lot of parents who use tough love like my sister and you
what, it didn't work, it made things worse, she is now raising
all three of her grandchildren, she doesn't even know where her
daughter is. And she never calls her own kids, how sad is that.
I really don't know what to say, tough love is a very hard set
of rules to follow, I know some parents who used it and say it
worked for them, and some say no way. |
luve
piphany |
Re: “Tough Love” vs “The
Fear of Drugs”
So,
what does one say to a Tough Lover that is positive they have it
all figured out? |
Rachel
sue76 |
Re: “Tough Love” vs “The
Fear of Drugs”
Quote:
With regard to alcohol, one famous
study found that the more a counselor confronts, the more
the client drinks; the same has now been found true for
drugs.
Wow, isn't that interesting?
Quote:
So for an hour, Anderson was kicked
and punched and a videotape of the incident shows absolutely
no resistance from the boy. A nurse stands by, watching,
once checking him with her stethoscope then allowing the
beating to continue. When the nine guards and “drill
instructors” believe the boy to be faking unconsciousness,
they shove ammonia in face until they finally recognize that
he isn’t faking and take him to the hospital.
You have to wonder where people get the
idea that you can beat something out of a person and "help"
them. Do these people really think that they are helping these
kids? It seems to me that it would be like it would be with a
dog. Most dogs get that beat dog thing going on. You try to
reach put to them to be kind to them and they cover. Rarely do
they ever get over that. If such treatment destroys an animal,
how could one be so stupid as to think that it would help a
child?
Quote:
The reason the nurse just stood
there, the reason the adults didn’t believe the kids, the
reason so many kids have died and been left with
post-traumatic stress disorder is the basic ideology of
tough love itself. The idea that hurting people helps them
is pernicious. If hurting people helps them, then a nurse
won’t intervene in a beating—by intervening, she’d be
harming! If hurting people helps them, complaints should be
ignored, because if they are believed, stopping the pain
interferes with “treatment!” If hurting people helps
them, sadism is charitable and empathy is cruelty.
And we wonder why the amount of violent
crimes continues to increase. If a parent treated their children
that way, they would be taken by the state. But for some reason
it is acceptable to have your children treated that way if you
are paying money for it? Amazing.
Quote:
We need to inform parents that not
only is tough love dangerous and unethical, it doesn’t do
what it’s supposed to do. It doesn’t help kids. And it hurts
all of us by devaluing empathy and promoting cruelty. For
kids who are genuinely troubled, we need evidence-based
treatment. For those whose only problem is that they smoked
a few joints, we need a sane drug policy that doesn’t
increase harm in order to sell its bankrupt ideology and
keep government bureaucrats employed. |
See also:
A plan for helping a loved one who uses meth
How can we, as loved ones, help meth addicts?
When does it become rock bottom?
Why love isn't enough
Back to Crystal Meth & Methamphetamine Questions, Answers & Advice
|